The Eurovision Song Contest is facing one of its most turbulent years in recent memory, as several countries announce boycotts over Israel’s participation. What is normally a unifying celebration of music, culture, and international cooperation has become the centre of political tension across Europe. Among the countries confirming their withdrawal is Spain, with its public broadcaster RTVE stating that it will not submit an entry for the upcoming contest. Their decision echoes a growing wave of criticism from artists, fans, and civil society groups who argue that allowing Israel to compete sends the wrong message during an ongoing humanitarian crisis.

The boycott movement has gained momentum quickly. Broadcasters in multiple European nations have issued statements expressing concern about the contest’s direction and what they describe as the European Broadcasting Union’s reluctance to respond appropriately to geopolitical realities. Critics argue that Eurovision cannot isolate itself from real-world events when participation carries symbolic weight. Many insist that cultural platforms should uphold ethical standards, especially when human rights are being debated on an international stage.

In Spain, the reaction has been particularly strong. Protests in major cities — including Madrid, Barcelona, and Valencia — have called for RTVE to take a stand. Artists, musicians, and industry professionals have also voiced support for a boycott, arguing that solidarity requires meaningful action. For many, the broadcaster’s decision reflects a wider public sentiment that cultural events should not appear indifferent to humanitarian concerns. Opponents of the boycott, however, argue that Eurovision should remain apolitical and that withdrawing only divides audiences further. Yet the number of countries pulling out suggests that the debate is far from settled.

The European Broadcasting Union (EBU) maintains that Eurovision is a non-political event and that participant eligibility is determined by broadcasting membership rather than geopolitical alliances. Despite the EBU’s position, many viewers feel that the organisation cannot fully separate entertainment from international affairs. Social media discussions have become increasingly heated, with fans expressing sadness, frustration, or support for the decisions being made.

Whether the boycott will reshape the contest long-term remains unknown. What is clear is that Eurovision is entering a new era of scrutiny, where public expectations extend far beyond music and staging. As more broadcasters consider their options, questions about the contest’s values and responsibilities continue to grow.

What Are Eurovision and the EBU?

The Eurovision Song Contest is an annual international music competition organised by the European Broadcasting Union (EBU). Despite its name, participating countries are not limited to Europe. Eligibility is based on membership in the EBU, which includes public broadcasters from across Europe, the Middle East, and beyond. This is why nations such as Israel, Australia, and others have been able to compete. Eurovision’s purpose is to promote cultural exchange, creativity, and international cooperation, making it one of the world’s longest-running and most-watched music events. However, its inclusive nature often places it at the centre of political debate.